T A K I N G    T H E    P H O T O G R A P H S    I S    O N L Y    H A L F    T H E    B A T T L E  . . .  C R A F T I N G    A N    I M A G E    I S    W H A T    S E T S    I T    A P A R T


 

A common misconception in architectural & interior photography is thinking that we just show up, snap some shots, upload them, tweak a few colors, send them over and that’s it. However, this type of photography takes a tremendous amount of work on-site and in post-production to end up with the final images that are delivered to the client. Hopefully this page can educate everyone on how these images are produced and the time and effort that is put in to make them come to life. Images (and I say ‘images’ because they are more than just a single photograph) can take anywhere from 30 minutes to a full day to edit each one. Ultimately, my goal is to help people understand the value and importance of hiring a specialized photographer in order to justify your investment and trust that I will give your project the care and attention to detail that it deserves. With that being said, please scroll down and enjoy the dramatic transformations!

Compare a normal single-exposure photo to my fully produced, staged, and retouched images


This is an example of MAJOR extensive editing. Consider this the Joan Rivers of retouching (RIP Joan!). After much debate on-site, the client and I determined that this was the best angle to accurately showcase the entire structure despite the light pole being dead center of the view. The cars also didn’t budge all day and since this was a college campus, we had no way to track down the owners to ask them to move. Therefore, I also had to position my tripod on the roof of my car to get high enough to clear the cars. I assured my client that I could work my magic so I summoned the Photoshop Gods and knocked this edit out. It took almost TWO full days to complete.


 

This one is from the same project as above, but not QUITE as an intense transformation. However, here you can see how much a difference it makes to remove phone poles, wires, signage, and other distracting elements. This helps the eye only focus on the star of the show: the building.


 

Here we have the twilight shot of the brand new beautiful MLK Center in all its glory, but the new baby tree was blocking the signage. I obviously couldn't trim it, and I couldn't position my camera any further to the left or right because you would have seen ugly power poles. Therefore, the only solution was to *gently* bend the branches so that each section of the lettering had a clear view to the camera. Then I just blended them in post. Also, there was a lot of parking lot clean up and handicap signs removed as well. This edit took one whole day. Literally. (And believe it or not, that cotton candy sky coloring was completely real--I just bumped up the contrast and saturation a little. )


 

Notice the heavy glare on the yellow wall...my polarizer filter is usually a magic worker when it comes to eliminating reflections, but it was no match for this monster glare. This had to be corrected during the shoot by placing tall black cloths in front of the windows to block the glare yet still showcase the texture and color of the wall. 

(Interior Design © IA - Interior Architects 2016)


 

This image has many elements that needed a lot of TLC. First, there were obviously a ton of reflections to deal with during the shoot, so many exposures were taken with all the lights off and blended in so you could see through to the open area outside the control room. Secondly, one of the TV’s was missing so I duplicated the far left one and skewed the perspective to make it look as natural as possible. Finally, this was a very tight space and this was as far as I could position my tripod back and used my widest lens, but when I corrected the overall perspective, it cut off some of the sides. Therefore, I had to rebuild some of the edges to preserve overall feel and size of the room.


 

This is a perfect example of when the decision to remove an item comes after the shoot is over. Obviously it would have been easier to move the coffee station off the counter during the shoot, but it was actually removed in post-production per the architect's request.


 

This is an example of when pesky furniture pieces cannot be moved during the shoot and must be taken out in post-production where I had to completely reconstruct the bottom right corner. 

 
 

 

This is a simple example of natural ambient light versus the use of supplemental lighting. Both are nice. What's your style?


 

During this shoot, the second end table had not arrived yet so we moved the one that we DID have to both spots, took separate photos of them, and then blended them in post-production.


 

In addition to removing debris and distracting lamp posts, this is an example of when the architect did not want signage to be seen on their building. 


 

Power lines blocking your building? No problem. 


 

Here the artwork had not arrived prior to the shoot so a "filler-piece" was added in post-production.


 

Using models is an easy and effective way to add life and movement to an image. Usually, I give my clients two versions -- one with people and one without. Also, most architects I work with request the removal of "code" items (i.e. sprinkler head, exit signs, large vents, floor cores, etc.). These subtle distractions play no part in the design of the space so they are easy to remove in post-production and make for a clean final image. Over 40 items were removed from this image...can you spot them all??

(Interior Design © IA - Interior Architects 2016)


 

You might think that I have extra human strength because I moved that giant garbage container myself, but no...it was all magically done in post! This image in its entirety was a labor love. Not only was my tripod actually on top of my SUV, but this image required lots of post-production in order to clean up the front driveway as well as adding in a fire to the fireplace.  


 

Halloween decorations had just been installed and were not allowed to be taken down. Therefore they were all meticulously removed in post-production. (This also intensified my hatred of spiders.)


 

Using my trusty Tilt Shift Lens, this image was made from two separate shots in order to realistically capture the size of the room and the ceiling details.